I took 2 screen shots of the Crow.   :light-saber:

So? Do you honestly believe he will be removed from his positions? Not a notion of it happening.  

It's interesting to look again at the note issued at the request of Bishop Fellay in light of recent events.From May 2011

From the latest GB district newsletter:

IGNIS ARDENS
The Ignis Ardens website states that 'it is a Taditionalist Catholic forum with a pro-SSPX bias... but that 'this forum's support for SSPX is not to be taken as evidence of the SSPX's support for this forum.'
The latter part of this statement is certainly true with regard to Ignis Ardens' involvement to date in a campaign which undermines the authority of the Society's General House.
I refer to the section entitled 'Krahgate,' which, under the cover of anonymity, raises serious allegations against Menzingen's lawyer, Maximilian Krah, and, by extension, against the Superior General himself.
Whilst this file, which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.
In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.
Father Paul Morgan."

No allegations were ever raised against the Menzingen lawyer nor has it ever been stated 'Krahgate' is false.

It's interesting to look again at the note issued at the request of Bishop Fellay in light of recent events.From May 2011

Quote

From the latest GB district newsletter:

IGNIS ARDENS
The Ignis Ardens website states that 'it is a Taditionalist Catholic forum with a pro-SSPX bias... but that 'this forum's support for SSPX is not to be taken as evidence of the SSPX's support for this forum.'
The latter part of this statement is certainly true with regard to Ignis Ardens' involvement to date in a campaign which undermines the authority of the Society's General House.
I refer to the section entitled 'Krahgate,' which, under the cover of anonymity, raises serious allegations against Menzingen's lawyer, Maximilian Krah, and, by extension, against the Superior General himself.
Whilst this file, which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.
In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.
Father Paul Morgan."

No allegations were ever raised against the Menzingen lawyer nor has it ever been stated 'Krahgate' is false.

As stated IA is not even an official SSPX website so perhaps Fr Morgan was under duress when issuing that note. It's more a case of Bishop Fellay and Max not liking what is written about them than allegations been made. IA was obviously meant to be a scapegoat.'Krahgate' remains on Fisheaters and non English language fora so obviously IA were to be made examples of and lamentably they removed the file. I still feel they should have stood their ground against the bullies.

With a difference between legal and lawful, I am of the understanding a request was made to have it removed. If I had been Clare, I would have refused to remove the file and allowed it to go to court. Just my personal view here.

Both IA and the UK district have tried to put a lid on the Krah affair. As long as the lawyer remains a blue-eyed boy of Menzingen, this will remain the case no matter what happens to their home-grown Bp. Williamson. But this revelation has to be a a vivid sign of a big policy change on the part of the leadership. What will happen to the constant mantra of the Society as regards the centuries-old malevolent Judaic and Freemasonic influence on the Church? Will it go the way of Vatican 2 criticism and be watered down until it disappears? Worse, be replaced with new mantra exposing schism and anti-semitism among traditionalists? Krah is leading the way.

Both IA and the UK district have tried to put a lid on the Krah affair. As long as the lawyer remains a blue-eyed boy of Menzingen, this will remain the case no matter what happens to their home-grown Bp. Williamson. But this revelation has to be a a vivid sign of a big policy change on the part of the leadership. What will happen to the constant mantra of the Society as regards the centuries-old malevolent Judaic and Freemasonic influence on the Church? Will it go the way of Vatican 2 criticism and be watered down until it disappears? Worse, be replaced with new mantra exposing schism and anti-semitism among traditionalists? Krah is leading the way.

The SSPX removed articles on the Jєωs from their websites. Some articles by Fr Denis Fahey, whom Bishop Tissier and others have regularly encouraged others to read. The writings of Fr Fahey contained an Imprimatur and were never placed on the Index.


Let's not forget what happened to 'Faith Imperiled by Reason: Benedict XVI's Hermeneutics'.  

So nobody should be too surprised at the direction Bishop Fellay was going in. Quite alot of the sermons atleast here in Ireland were very stage managed, preparing the way, spoon feeding type sermons.

A few years ago a priest stationed here brought the SSPX youth group to Rome for a pilgrimage and recently when Cardinal Burke visited Ireland he told a SSPX priest to "keep up the good work". The priest he said this to is pro-agreement.

It was necessary to stab Bishop Williamson in the back because those 30 pieces of Vatican Silver were so appealing. It always disgusts me to sell out your principles to get a deal.

Expectedly Krah's Facebook page has been scabbed. Who has screen captures?

That should be "scrubbed," but the spell-checker made a substitution I did not notice until too late to edit.

On a Mac Command-Shift-3 and Command-Shift-4 give full screen and selective screen captures respectively. On other PCs "I dunno."

It's very unnerving that the SSPX leadership has given him so much power and control.  It will be difficult to wrench themselves from his hold.  He even looks sinister.  But maybe it was just a bad day.
 :shocked:  

Your fears are not without merit. We must acknowledge that the people with whom Mr. Krah are associated are international criminals.  Tel Aviv University is no more than a Mossad front which produces many Zionist operatives at all levels.

It is a hotbed of revolutionaries and intelligence activity. Objectively, this places the SSPX in association with the myriad of criminal activities of these groups. The implications are beyond serious. They are disasterous.

With Mr.Krah placing himself publicly with such approving proximity to a group which has been docuмented to have engaged in murder, assasination, drug trafficking, the sex trade, terrorism, and many other heinous activities, it is entirely baffling as to why Bishop Fellay has not immediately distanced the Society from him.

This is a very grave situation and one which must be forced into the light of day.

Quote

it is entirely baffling as to why Bishop Fellay has not immediately distanced the Society from him.

I'm not baffled as to why Bishop Fellay hasn't distanced the Society from Krah but am more baffled by the indifference shown by those attending the chapels though being honest what can people do. The SSPX must be more pro-Jєωιѕн than they would like people to believe.Why did they remove articles about Jєωs and treat a Bishop who told the truth about the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' in such a manner?

I once had an angry phone call because I suggested people were stupid.

Actually John, ignorant is more accurate. With some it is deliberate, others have been socially re-engineered to the point of manifesting the symptoms of stupid. I think that a lot of the SSPX priests are ignorant of the mentioned realities. I do notice that they as a rule do not mention it.
In all the sermons against the deal, not once has anyone addressed this manifest scandal. There again, another mystery?