Author Topic: Peter Wensierski and Maximilian Krah (Read 9942 times)

John Grace · « **Reply #15 on:** July 02, 2012, 11:59:52 AM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

I took 2 screen shots of the Crow. :light-saber:

So? Do you honestly believe he will be removed from his positions? Not a notion of it happening.

morningstar · « **Reply #16 on:** July 02, 2012, 12:06:43 PM »

Here is the "religion page" he "likes"...it's listed under his "interests"

The Crow's religion page he "liked" on Facebook

He has also "liked" a page which displays pornography....for obvious reasons of not scandalizing members I shall not post it here. He is despicable.

John Grace · « **Reply #17 on:** July 02, 2012, 12:21:02 PM »

It's interesting to look again at the note issued at the request of Bishop Fellay in light of recent events.From May 2011

Quote

From the latest GB district newsletter:

IGNIS ARDENS
The Ignis Ardens website states that 'it is a Taditionalist Catholic forum with a pro-SSPX bias... but that 'this forum's support for SSPX is not to be taken as evidence of the SSPX's support for this forum.'
The latter part of this statement is certainly true with regard to Ignis Ardens' involvement to date in a campaign which undermines the authority of the Society's General House.
I refer to the section entitled 'Krahgate,' which, under the cover of anonymity, raises serious allegations against Menzingen's lawyer, Maximilian Krah, and, by extension, against the Superior General himself.
Whilst this file, which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.
In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.
Father Paul Morgan."

No allegations were ever raised against the Menzingen lawyer nor has it ever been stated 'Krahgate' is false.

John Grace · « **Reply #18 on:** July 02, 2012, 12:31:50 PM »

Quote from: morningstar

Here is the "religion page" he "likes"...it's listed under his "interests"

The Crow's religion page he "liked" on Facebook

He has also "liked" a page which displays pornography....for obvious reasons of not scandalizing members I shall not post it here. He is despicable.

This was all docuмented and brought to the attention of the SSPX. Krah is on the board of a girls school in Germany.

Very disturbingly, Diego related a scenario of a SSPX cleric claiming not to know who Krah was and we had recently a priest state it was normal for Krah to do this to enhance his career.

The SSPX have been able to "explain away" a very disturbing episode in their Society history.

Whilst it hasn't been confirmed if it indeed it was Fr F Laisney SSPX who said "He is one of our faithful", has any effort been made to remove this Krah?

John Grace · « **Reply #19 on:** July 02, 2012, 12:37:08 PM »

Quote from: John Grace

It's interesting to look again at the note issued at the request of Bishop Fellay in light of recent events.From May 2011

Quote
From the latest GB district newsletter:

IGNIS ARDENS
The Ignis Ardens website states that 'it is a Taditionalist Catholic forum with a pro-SSPX bias... but that 'this forum's support for SSPX is not to be taken as evidence of the SSPX's support for this forum.'
The latter part of this statement is certainly true with regard to Ignis Ardens' involvement to date in a campaign which undermines the authority of the Society's General House.
I refer to the section entitled 'Krahgate,' which, under the cover of anonymity, raises serious allegations against Menzingen's lawyer, Maximilian Krah, and, by extension, against the Superior General himself.
Whilst this file, which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.
In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.
Father Paul Morgan."

No allegations were ever raised against the Menzingen lawyer nor has it ever been stated 'Krahgate' is false.

As stated IA is not even an official SSPX website so perhaps Fr Morgan was under duress when issuing that note. It's more a case of Bishop Fellay and Max not liking what is written about them than allegations been made. IA was obviously meant to be a scapegoat.'Krahgate' remains on Fisheaters and non English language fora so obviously IA were to be made examples of and lamentably they removed the file. I still feel they should have stood their ground against the bullies.

With a difference between legal and lawful, I am of the understanding a request was made to have it removed. If I had been Clare, I would have refused to remove the file and allowed it to go to court. Just my personal view here.