https://x.com/DefiantLs/status/1848506293830488236

Very, very apt.

Whether a republic or monarchy etc, what matters is Christ in the hearts of man, that is why the American Revolution did not end in a total nightmare while the French Revolution who copied the exact same recipe ended in a total nightmare that they have never recovered from that... because the French thought they could do away with Christ along with the King, the builders rejected the cornerstone in Matthew 21:42. Even Napoleon Bonaparte, with glorious French history like Charlemagne, would pointedly reject that by placing the crown on his own head and chase after doomed figures like Julius Caesar instead. 

Much of that period was caught up too much on the 'system' and not enough on the reign of Christ in the hearts of man, that's why Portugal on track to end up worse than even the Bolshevik Revolution, did not end like that thanks to Our Lady of Fatima, there is a common theme with both the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution, both of those had a cινιℓ ωαr where Christians instead of focusing on the reign of Christ in the hearts of man were too focused on the system and these Monarchs had flaws so the revolutionaries were not entirely wrong on everything, but they rejected the cornerstone, and many counter revolutionaries were too focused on the system and not enough on the reign of Christ in the hearts of man IMO.

As said in other threads, it wasn't the Vendee that ended the reign of terror, in fact they spurred it on, it was the Martyrs of Compiegne that ended the reign of terror and resulted in the blood thirsty tyrant Robespierre being executed. The Vendee, despite their best efforts did not accomplish that, but the Martyrs of Compiegne did.

Unlike Alexander Solzhenitsyn's 'pacifism' conclusion though, there is a time and place for everything, for Constantine the Great received the Chi-Rho and King Louis XIV was given the Sacred Heart as a military standard (which he rejected), but it's not for lay Christians to take matters into their own hands when legitimate authority spurns such graces. 

"Our Lady of Victory, Ark of the New Covenant, Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate, Pray for us."

God Bless

Yes, but I think Dr Carson's comments also address the issue of whether Americans can/will be allowed to continue to say/write things such as "Jesus is Lord" (ie. preach the Faith) in a hαɾɾιs administration vs a Trump administration.  This is a very real concern.

These two pro-life young men were mocked, censored, pushed and shoved, and thrown out of hαɾɾιs' rally. I posted this in another thread, but here is their interview on Fox:

Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 on X: "The two pro-life protesters that were mocked at the hαɾɾιs rally in WI were interviewed this morning on Fox & Friends weekend https://t.co/Y4H0Aoo44o" / X

Yup, I'd already watched it from when you last posted it and gave you a thumbs up. :)

God Bless

I doubt it'll happen ... since even the atheist judges realize that it's unconstitutional. 

What!... Your not that naïve!!!... you can't be that naïve!!!

I mean, we've literally been living it, was twitter held accountable for just de-platforming a sitting President and essentially cutting out his tongue? (at the time he was calling for protestors to obey law enforcement and to leave, very odd if your goal was to stop Jan 6 to ban Trump at that moment, unless of course they wanted Jan 6 to happen) That was Trump's platform and it was built on the premise that Twitter was a platform not a publisher, and if they so boldly did that to Trump, a sitting President... what do you think they've been doing quietly to everyone else? Shadow banning, de-boosting etc etc. You can speak, but nobody will hear you! Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach! What good is the freedom to speak if nobody can hear what you have to say?

I mean, there is so much on this front that to say such a thing when I have personally seen it so badly and so boldly so many times over many years on so many fronts... this is impossible unless you are a very dishonest person who very clearly has an ulterior motive! So dishonest... so foolish!

The first person they will shut down is Elon Musk (something they've already tried to do numerous times now, first the advertising and ability to even function monetarily)... precisely why Elon Musk rightly recognises the importance of this election, then when they come for the rest of us we will have no way to defend ourselves... taking down someone like Elon Musk will simply be the canary in the coal mine, then others accuse Elon Musk of already curtailing free speech in the EU not realizing that he has to obey the laws of respective Countries to even operate, a very tricky minefield when it comes to these wicked, wicked snakes using every tactic and trick in the book to take away peoples right to speak.

The deception going on is unbelievably strong! The gall that you could say such a thing! What the hell man?

"For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world."

What!... Your not that naïve!!!... you can't be that naïve!!!

I mean, we've literally been living it, was twitter held accountable for just de-platforming a sitting President and essentially cutting out his tongue?

Pay attention, would you?  They didn't deplatform him for being Christian.  I pointed out that it would require a few steps and a progression (with some Hegelian manipulation) before they could get away with silencing people just referring to Jesus in public.  There are just way too many Christians in this country for them to be able to get away with it at this time.  They'll have to work on it.

If Trump gets in, they'll start with silencing "Anti-Semitism" ... with Trump having promised / boasted to some Jєωs that he was going to get rid of the "Antisemites".  If hαɾɾιs gets in, they'll likely incite or stage some kind of violence blamed on MAGA types that'll lead them to outlaw various "right-wing" sentiments.  Most right-wingers are actually Pro Israel.  So it depends on which end of the Hegelian divide they want to go after first.

Their path to outlawing Christianity would be to start by outlawing anything critical to be said of sodomites and/or Jєωs, and then try to associate Christianity with being anti-sodomite and anti-Jєωιѕн.  Trump is both pro-sodomite and pro-Jєωιѕн, so he's just as likely to eliminate free speech in those areas as hαɾɾιs would be.

Oh I am, you need to open your eyes, if anything it'll start with those calling for stuff like wiping Israel off the map and kill the Jєωs or claims that Hitler should've 'finished the job' or other such stupid nonsense, of course, some Jєωs have said similarly when it comes to Gaza and with Free Speech such things can and are highlighted on their side too, which is just as wrong, but in any case, we will cross that bridge when we get to it, but to suggest for even a second that the alternative of Hαɾɾιs would be better is unbelievably dumb! Your either blinded by irrational hatred, you cannot think a step ahead or your a saboteur IMO.

No, you're an easily-manipulated simple-minded fool.  I didn't say hαɾɾιs would be better, but that both candidates are controlled and will be used to further whatever goals the controllers have as their next priorities.  They'll select either one of their assets, depending upon which end of the Hegelian dialectic they feel is most expedient to work on next.  If they select Trump (my current guess), they'll work on shutting down the Left who are protesting against Israel's genocide by going after and shutting down "Anti-Semitism" (which Trump promised he would do in Making Israel Great Again).  If they select hαɾɾιs, they'll continue forward on their agenda to shut down Right-Wing "disinformation" and "conspiracy theory".  I also said that they're several steps away, in their dialectic, from outlawing the mere mention of Christ and Christian principles.  There are far too many Christians out here for them to be able to pull that off.  They work these things in step, marching left, right, left, right with their Hegelian dialectic.  They may even need to pull off some fαℓѕє fℓαg attacks to justify coming down on Christians, such as some staged attacks on sodomites by various bad government actors posing as Christians, etc.