I found it curious, that such a perverted occultist who had the idea of inverting everything, and encouraging his followers to sin to bring about the end, then became a Roman Catholic, along with many (100,000?) of his cultish followers. It wasn't a sincere conversation for him or them, but somehow he managed to finagle his way into the Royal Houses of Europe and maintain influence despite that.
What's missing is a clear connection to the twentieth century infiltration after that. It seems the line dies out and there is no continuum. I have to get hold of Icke's book and see whether he makes one.
I wonder why the Royal Houses of Europe and senior churchmen were not more circuмspect and suspicious of such "converts" given their background. Did they see baptism as a sort of sterilization of those perversions and rely on it too heavily perhaps?
e.g. If Hans Kung had joined the SSPX in 1990 would traditionists simply trust him or view his every moving through the lens of suspicion until his death?
Did the RCC ever have a policy of not trusting converts with prior perverted and anti-catholic agendas?