Honestly many on here are just so bitter.. Art whether used for Catholic ends doesn't have to be inextricably linked to the 1950s boomer aesthetic, or even the Renaissance. Ironically, the idea itself of gothic or morose complexions are even aligned with grand Catholic art of the past. Which painting of a saint has a big smile full of white teeth? The opposite really, from St. Francis of Assisi to St. Jerome you will find them morose, sad and serious in universally acclaimed paintings nobody would call occult. Them holding and contemplating death by holding a human skull is anything but happy go lucky. And I'm not even mentioning the gore or devilish depictions either..
I suggest you guys take a look at Caravaggio or Rembrandt. Many of their works are considered to be dark or gothic, I've personally seen paintings of St. Jerome used in horror games for that very reason.
Also, the aesthetic I'm going for isn't even that novel. There's an old painting you all would know called American Gothic, it's essentially what I'm going for. There's a reason younger people find tradcats so out of touch. I've personally spoken to many guys wanting to convert or have recently converted that find Catholicism dull and entirely dominated by boomers. I'm trying to show people that it's not necessarily the case.
It's one thing to say you subjectively don't like certain art or aesthetics, everyone is of course free to have their personal tastes, but to go around calling things you don't like occult or implying it's something illicit is just absurd.