It depends on one's sensibilities. Some people get very distraught when they have too much information and they should probably minimise their exposure to it. Others are capable of digesting a great deal of information, and more importantly, drawing the necessary conclusions.
It happens however, that those in the first category resent those in the second category and feel that reading and research they have done is too devisive. Accusations of this type, from someone not willing to take to time to read and study is annoying at best.
It's for this reason that I do not discuss the crisis in the Church, covid or the Jєωs with my family as it always ends up with accusations of being proudful or divisive. As impatience is one of my major faults, I try to avoid finding myself in occasions of this particular sin.
Those who do read and study are bringing valuable knowledge to others and should not be ostracised. To get to the truth, a discussion or debate between two knowledgable persons is very useful. We have seen these on CI on many occasions and these threads are a great source of information. A challenge from someone who knows little, and is not interested to learn more, to someone who knows a lot is time consuming and not of much use.
For those willing to do the work, we are regretfully obliged, in this day and age, to research the Church Crisis, evolution, science, medecine, education, and current affairs, because those whose job it is to teach us, in fact misinform us.
And this applies also to builders, plumbers, car mechanics and the rest of it. We need to know a little of their trade in order not to get ripped off.
To conclude. Yes there is an information overload, but some have the graces to consume, digest, inform and teach and most importantly conclude. Some don't and should be grateful for those that do have taken the time to share their conclusions.