First point is, someone has mentioned that A.A. has low success rates, but this is nothing to the point. I do not blame weight rooms because we have a bunch of fat people roaming about in society. In the early days A.A. had very high success rates, 50-75 percent. Today the judges and lawyers mandate that drunks do A.A. meetings; e.g. Johnny has had one too many DUI's, so the judge mandates that he go to AA for thirty days. The truth is Johnny is not done drinking. But A.A. is not to blame, that is ridiculous.
Alcoholics Anonymous was founded in 1935, and countless "Traditional Catholics" have frequented A.A. and put together substantial periods of sobriety. Fr. Ralph Pfau was the first priest to get sober in A.A. in November, 1941, and he died sober in 1967. He gave A.A. retreats all over America. If A.A. were filled with Freemasons and dangerous for Catholics, as some of you foolishly claim, then I doubt these priests and lay Catholics would invest so much time and energy in A.A. A.A. is not a religious organization and has never claimed to be, hence Catholics are not in endangering their Faith by A.A. attendance.
I have noticed in this Anonymous thread (I have no idea why it is anonymous) that some of you are offering immature, uninformed opinions about something you know very little about. It was always our impression that if one were ignorant about a topic then he ought to listen in humble silence to those who do know something, and not blather useless opinions, and dangerous opinions at that. I would never tell an alcoholic Catholic not to go to A.A. That is terrible advice.