Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Disciplining wife  (Read 20273 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Disciplining wife
« Reply #195 on: May 13, 2020, 05:04:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Remove the beam from your eye before removing the splinter from hers.
    But also like...is disciplining really necessary? Isn't fraternal correction a thing still?
    Plus if you're such a bad communicator that you can't have a civil, logical, and respectful conversation to correct your wife and have to resort to physical violence, you probably shouldn't be married at all. And your wife should call the cops.
    Also PSA to any wives here who are being "punished" physically by your husbands: it is abuse, please call the police for your own safety and for the safety of any children you may have. Your husband does not have the right to beat you into submission, because it is his duty as a husband to protect you. And if he's beating you, he is certainly not protecting you.
    Read the thread. It is not only allowed but necessary in many circuмstances.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #196 on: May 13, 2020, 03:17:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And should this discipline take place in front of the children?

    What should be a wife's response to either verbal or physical discipline?

    And what if said discipline is given in anger, as a means of hurting the other person, rather than being done out of charity, for the true good of their soul?  What recourse does the wife have then?

    I only ask because my husband verbally corrects me--out of anger, very often with a raised voice and hurtful words (ie: stupid) in front of my children.  Now that my sons are turning older, they too yell, criticize, or blame me when things go wrong.

    I'm especially interested in the thoughts of those who advocate for wifely discipline.  If done incorrectly, it can and does affect your wife's thoughts and care for you and the attitudes of the children towards their mother.  


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #197 on: May 13, 2020, 06:15:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But also like...is disciplining really necessary? Isn't fraternal correction a thing still?
    What's the difference? I say "discipline" because we're dealing with a subordinate.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #198 on: May 13, 2020, 06:55:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Equality isn't the issue here.  Obviously a devout, saintly lay woman is far superior to a corrupt, wicked Pope.

    What's at issue is order.  Superiority of rank is not give (necessarily) in proportion to the worthiness of the one holding rank.

    That's why lay people pay respect and give deference to even an unworthy priest.  By giving him such reverence, we are not revering his personal worth, but rather the God from Whom all order comes and to Whom all order leads.

    When a woman is obedient to her unworthy husband, she's not obeying him because he's better, but because she's falling in line with the order established by God.

    In fact, the greater the merit before God, and the greater the honor given Him, when the ones to whom we subordinate ourselves are personally unworthy of such respect.

    People need to get over themselves.  Wives, when you obey your husbands, you are honoring God more than the husband.  When you dishonor your husband, you dishonor God.  It has precious little to do with the merits of the man himself.

    Those in authority, the authority is not given to lord it over your subordinates but to serve them.  You are given the authority to lead your subordinates to God ... not to yourself.  You are to subject your subordinates not primarily to yourself, but to God.

    With that said, the primary consideration of discipline is whether it brings them closer to God.  EVEN in the case of adultery (mentioned by the saints), you are not authorized to apply corporal punishment unless you are genuinely convinced that it would correct the fault.  You can't just do it out of revenge or spite.  I submit that it's an extraordinarily rare situation in which such a thing might actually help.  In the vast majority of cases, it'll make the wife resent you even more and be even less likely to be obedient and respectful.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #199 on: May 13, 2020, 07:04:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I clearly detect in the tone of those vocally advocating corporal punishment of wives by their husband an air of superiority and a desire to dominate and exert themselves over women.

    This subjection of women to men is actually a product of Original Sin.  In its pure unfallen form, the relationship is one of a harmonious complementarity.  Just like in a dance, it only works if one person leads and the other follows.  If both try to lead or neither does, then the dance become disordered and chaotic.  In their unfallen state, men just naturally tend to lead, while women naturally follow without any tension or conflict or exertion of the one over the other.  But as a result of the fall, where women are inclined to refuse to follow, God has made it so that the husband has the right to exert himself over her ... as a way of artificially holding this order together as much as possible ... until the restoration of all things at the end of the world.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #200 on: May 13, 2020, 08:03:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This subjection of women to men is actually a product of Original Sin.  In its pure unfallen form, the relationship is one of a harmonious complementarity.  Just like in a dance, it only works if one person leads and the other follows.  If both try to lead or neither does, then the dance become disordered and chaotic.  In their unfallen state, men just naturally tend to lead, while women naturally follow without any tension or conflict or exertion of the one over the other.  But as a result of the fall, where women are inclined to refuse to follow, God has made it so that the husband has the right to exert himself over her ... as a way of artificially holding this order together as much as possible ... until the restoration of all things at the end of the world.
    Summa Theologica, First Part, Question 92, Article 1

    Subjection is twofold. One is servile, by virtue of which a superior makes use of a subject for his own benefit; and this kind of subjection began after sin. There is another kind of subjection which is called economic or civil, whereby the superior makes use of his subjects for their own benefit and good; and this kind of subjection existed even before sin. For good order would have been wanting in the human family if some were not governed by others wiser than themselves. So by such a kind of subjection woman is naturally subject to man, because in man the discretion of reason predominates. Nor is inequality among men excluded by the state of innocence, as we shall prove

    Offline RiseOfSkywalkerIsSubpar

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 30
    • Reputation: +20/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #201 on: May 13, 2020, 09:17:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What's the difference? I say "discipline" because we're dealing with a subordinate.
    From New Advent: "Fraternal correction is here taken to mean the admonishing of one's neighbor by a private individual with the purpose of reforming him or, if possible, preventing his sinful indulgence. This is clearly distinguishable from an official disciplining, whose mouthpiece is a judge or other like superior, whose object is the punishment of one found to be guilty, and whose motive is not so directly the individual advantage of the offender as the furtherance of the common good."
    And from Catholic.com: "The opening line of the key New Testament passage about the relationship God intends to exist between husbands and wives is this: Husbands and wives should “be subject to one another.” [Ephesians 5:21] The wife “subjects” herself to her husband by accepting his role as head. That is, she cooperates with him in filling that role of service to her and the children. The husband, on the other hand, “subjects” himself to his wife by accepting—and doing his best to fulfill—her needs for love and care, provision and order, day after day, so long as they both shall live. God intends that there should be mutual subjection of husbands and wives."
    So no spouse is really subordinate to other, so if you want to discipline your wife, then maybe you should let her paddle you too.
    But I'll reiterate my original question: why can't a difference of opinions be solved with a logical, rational, and respectful conversation? You're two adults (presumably) and physical violence should be a last recourse.
    I would also like to point out that the 5th Commandment, "Thou shalt not kill" does not apply simply to killing another being, but also to striking another person in anger. Should you feel that it is absolutely necessary to beat your wife, I would suggest not doing so while angry, because that's a sin.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #202 on: May 13, 2020, 09:31:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • RiseOfSkywalkerSucksSucks

    You are not a real man. A real man doesn't talk such BS in these times. Wake up and fight the evil powers of today, not women!


    Offline RiseOfSkywalkerIsSubpar

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 30
    • Reputation: +20/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #203 on: May 13, 2020, 09:57:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Read the thread. It is not only allowed but necessary in many circuмstances.

    First of all, it's "not only...but also"; please use correct grammar.
    Second of all, I replied to the thread because I hadn't seen any argument here that sufficiently proved to me (citing Church theology, not private revelation) the so-called necessity of physical violence against one's spouse.
    Plus, what does punishment do except say, "You're wrong and because I have authority, I get to punish you."? It doesn't explain why a person is wrong or how to avoid being wrong in the future. It just makes a wife afraid to disagree with her husband even in matters that don't pertain to Catholicism or morality.
    Plus, what does punishment do except say, "You're wrong and because I have authority, I get to punish you."? It doesn't explain why a person is wrong or how to avoid being wrong in the future. It just makes a wife afraid to disagree with her husband even in matters that don't pertain to Catholicism or morality.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #204 on: May 13, 2020, 10:17:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • RiseOfSkywalkerSucksSucks

    You are not a real man. A real man doesn't talk such BS in these times. Wake up and fight the evil powers of today, not women!
    That's "RiseOfSkywalkerSucks" to you. It doesn't double suck :laugh1: (at least not in my opinion).
    It would also help if you identify what my bologna-sausage (that is what BS means, right?) is, identify why it is bologna-sausage (I'm willing to have an open conversation about why I might be wrong, but just telling me I'm wrong isn't going to make me believe you), and how I'm fighting women, as your post suggests I am.
    Also, could you please clarify on how I need to wake up? Because I just drank about 10 ozs. of regular coffee and am feeling pretty buzzed...Wait, when you say I need to wake up, do you mean I need to become more woke?

    Offline RiseOfSkywalkerIsSubpar

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 30
    • Reputation: +20/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #205 on: May 13, 2020, 10:19:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Many women are among the evil powers. You need to wake up and see it. And a real man isn't afraid to call out the evil woman.
    Likewise, a real woman isn't afraid to call out evil men.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #206 on: May 14, 2020, 05:42:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Second of all, I replied to the thread because I hadn't seen any argument here that sufficiently proved to me (citing Church theology, not private revelation) the so-called necessity of physical violence against one's spouse.
    In a normal society people would receive corporal punishment for smaller crimes. Crimes that do not merit the death penalty.
    In this normal society, where children would be spanked also, it is part of the culture that if you do something bad, especially serious sin, there are physical consequences.
    THIS IS IMITATING GOD himself, who punishes physically with purgatory. His representatives on earth are priests, those in political power and husbands.
    So every sin deserves punishment physically. But for things which people struggle against with difficulty, mercy comes in. Because if a women is trying her best to fight a vice and if the vice is venial, then there is a certain point where, yes, it might turn her against God, and therefore against her husband. But the norm is that every sin has physical consequences. It is question for the husband of deciding what to tolerate and what not to tolerate.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4160
    • Reputation: +2304/-1201
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #207 on: May 14, 2020, 06:24:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In a normal society people would receive corporal punishment for smaller crimes. Crimes that do not merit the death penalty.
    In this normal society, where children would be spanked also, it is part of the culture that if you do something bad, especially serious sin, there are physical consequences.
    THIS IS IMITATING GOD himself, who punishes physically with purgatory. His representatives on earth are priests, those in political power and husbands.
    So every sin deserves punishment physically. But for things which people struggle against with difficulty, mercy comes in. Because if a women is trying her best to fight a vice and if the vice is venial, then there is a certain point where, yes, it might turn her against God, and therefore against her husband. But the norm is that every sin has physical consequences. It is question for the husband of deciding what to tolerate and what not to tolerate.
    This is a good explanation of the former understanding of corporal punishment in Western culture.  In the past, corporal punishment was used in virtually every  authority-subject relationship:  In school (including university), in the military, in civil law, in the family, etc.  And it is reasonable to call this "a normal society" because many other cultures also do this.

    But we do not live in a society like this.  In our culture corporal punishment has been eliminated in every area except for discipline of children and even that receives a lot of opposition.   In our society, a husband using corporal punishment on his wife is committing a crime and could lose everything.  

    One can argue that this is a bad law and that the past understanding was better, but that is a theoretical discussion.  In practice, using corporal punishment on one's wife is extremely imprudent.  And even the proponents of it here realize this, no matter what they say, because not one of them is willing to put his name to his posts.  They are not willing to deal with the consequences of merely talking about it, so why would anyone risk the consequences of actually doing it.

    The other characteristic of the proponents here is that not one of them has claimed to be married.  This is not a surprising trait in people talking about marriage in a completely impractical way.  The men who have written in this thread whom we know are married have all been opposed to it. That alone tells us something.  

    Whatever may be the practice of "a normal society" corporal punishment is neither practical nor prudent in ours.  If a few individuals attempt to use it, it will not change our society into a "normal" one.  Rather it brings the full force of societal disapproval on those individuals.  There is no command from God that obliges anyone to undertake a risk of that sort.  There are other issues in which it makes sense to take a stand against society (abortion springs to mind) and we should save our energy for those.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #208 on: May 14, 2020, 06:24:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And should this discipline take place in front of the children?

    What should be a wife's response to either verbal or physical discipline?

    And what if said discipline is given in anger, as a means of hurting the other person, rather than being done out of charity, for the true good of their soul?  What recourse does the wife have then?

    I only ask because my husband verbally corrects me--out of anger, very often with a raised voice and hurtful words (ie: stupid) in front of my children.  Now that my sons are turning older, they too yell, criticize, or blame me when things go wrong.

    I'm especially interested in the thoughts of those who advocate for wifely discipline.  If done incorrectly, it can and does affect your wife's thoughts and care for you and the attitudes of the children towards their mother.  
    As one of the main posters here, I want to first praise your humility in accepting this teaching. I also wish to praise your courage for speaking out, even though it is anonymous. The devil does everything in his power to stop true humility in women.
    So for my thoughts on your questions; The first overall thing I would say, is resist the temptation to want to control your husband and sons. Your power is in your humility and purity just as the Blessed Virgin's is. (You are already set apart by accepting this teaching - so take the next step) When their anger subsides, and they have some moments to themselves in prayer, they will see their error if they are of good will. Your perseverance in prayer will help achieve that grace for them. Even as a mother your influence is limited, as every wise woman knows. They have their free will.
    With the limited amount of information about your circuмstances, I cannot say too much with certainty. It may be possible that your husband is not actually correcting you on something you even need to be corrected on. But even if that is true, your reaction should be to reason with him by way of questions rather than telling him what to do. That way, it leaves the door open for you to learn if you are wrong, and forces him to exercise his higher powers of reason rather than emotions. And if in doing this he tells you to stop asking questions, then simply sigh and look downwards. If he is not a brute, he will eventually be touched by this.


    If on the other hand, you are genuinely sinning then obviously the best thing to do is to admit your sin. In front of the kids too. There is nothing more salutary than a husband and children seeing the mother admit she is a sinner. And yes, they may be hypocrites by accepting this and yet never doing the same, but you can never change the order of nature which makes men above women, just as I can never be above a priest, or above a judge or leader in society.


    Some other points. On discipline given in anger. This is a frequent question. Here is one answer; Be careful about judging with such absolute certainty that it is JUST given in anger. As men we are made to see in justice more easily than women, and to be angry about it. We become holy as men by purifying that virtue to apply in exactly the right circuмstances and with the right measure. It is possible that what your husband is being overly zealous about a fault of yours. It is also possible though that you cannot see a fault. You should be open to that too.


    Finally, if after praying and reflecting a lot, you are convinced that it is not a fault, then you should respond as any good Christian should, by acting like Christ, who was abused in circuмstances, that you and I will probably never have to endure. If it is getting too much and something needs to be done, then you can try reaching out to a man (priest included), who may be able to influence him. But it doesn't sound like this is the case. It is only for exceptionally serious circuмstances.


    If I can also offer some general thoughts regarding people in our lives that we have some influence regardless of, if it is our children or some others. As, I said our influence over people is limited. I myself gained great peace in my life, by fully accepting this point. Once we do, I think the next step is to always make the most of the situation we are in. By always seeing our glass half full. St. Ignatius said that ingratitude was the root of all evil.


    Are you getting enough food on the table? Well thank God for that. So many are not. Are you paying all the bills? Again so many cannot. Are your children in good health? Do they say their prayers? There is, I see, so much ingratitude among traditional Catholics, who seem to want to out-compete each-other and are so quick to judge circuмstances. For me, if we focus on the truth and our adherence to accepting this with humility, then the other things fall into place.


    This is how we should "judge" other people. On whether they accept the truth. Whether it be the question corporal punishment, or some other truth relating to God's creation or the natural order. (These are the common ones). Because, you see, what good is it that people do all these wonderful acts of piety, if they cannot accept the superiority of husbands over wives? They do all their piety in a spirit of distrust of God's word and His creation. What they do has not got true value until they change this attitude.


    I think that if you you practice true gratitude, and joy in your circuмstances you will achieve a hundred times more than if you worry about how to convince your husband and family about x or y.



    That's my two cents.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Disciplining wife
    « Reply #209 on: May 14, 2020, 06:41:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • But we do not live in a society like this.  In our culture corporal punishment has been eliminated in every area except for discipline of children and even that receives a lot of opposition.   In our society, a husband using corporal punishment on his wife is committing a crime and could lose everything.  


    The other characteristic of the proponents here is that not one of them has claimed to be married.  This is not a surprising trait in people talking about marriage in a completely impractical way.  The men who have written in this thread whom we know are married have all been opposed to it. That alone tells us something. 
    Filtered out these two points of yours because they are persistent errors that you seem not to learn from.
    1. It is for the man to judge the opportune time. You, even as an older woman, while certainly possessing maturity in some ways, are nonetheless a woman. It is NOT YOUR PLACE to make this judgement EVER. It depends on each husband in each circuмstance to see how much he can get away with without bringing the authorities down on him. The fact that you have not mentioned this at all, shows how little you understand men after years of being married.
    2.  Again, even though you were corrected on this second point you seem not to learn. Or even try to make abstractions. There are many men who discipline their wives. Simply because your husband does not, and you do not know those who do, does not make this the norm, or the way things should be.
    Those who do discipline their wives may only have had to do it a handful of times, and so are not going to waste their time talking about it on an internet forum. Most of them do not care either for zealously promoting it because they just get on with it.
    There are those who do it more frequently. Again, we have to remember that this is a deeply personal issue at the heart of a marriage. Most are not comfortable bringing it up on a forum.
    Finally, even if I was disciplining my wife, do you think I would admit it, making myself criminally liable on a web forum??? I mean how much intelligence do you have to have to get this point? No husbands should admit to doing this, but rather talk about it in the abstract and theoretical sense to avoid having Matthew receiving a subpoena for IP addresses.